Are Homo Sapiens More Like Bonobos or Common Chimpanzees?

Posted on 4th November 2008 by Ryan Somma in Ionian Enchantment

The title of this article might mislead some readers. While Bonobos and chimpanzees share a 94% genetic similarity to us, we need to remember that they are merely the closest relatives on the evolutionary tree that survives today. If both these species were to go extinct, which appears increasingly likely, the title of this article would become, “Are we more like orang utans or gorillas?” As close a resemblance these many primates bare to us, there were other species in the past that that were even more human-like, like Neanderthals and Homo erectus. The later, despite the close relationship, would have probably killed and eaten you upon first introductions.

Homo Erectus

Homo Erectus
(the Velociraptor of Human Ancestry)

We humans share a common ancestor with all chimpanzees that existed five to eight million years ago, bonobos and common chimpanzees diverged less than one-million years ago, soon after they became separated by the formation of the Congo river. Bonobos are technically a type of chimpanzee, but, for the purposes of this article, the world “chimpanzee” refers to the common chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes.

Both chimpanzees and bonobos use tools, from stones to crack nuts to sticks to fish termites out of mounds. The two species also have the capacity for language, with case studies of chimpanzees exhibiting a sign-language vocabulary of over one-hundred words, as well as bonobos making up new words. Both have expressive faces, which we humans can easily read and understand what’s being communicated, and both exhibit signs of empathy toward one another and to other species.

While both species use tools, chimpanzees use spears, which they sharpen with their teeth, to hunt other primates. Chimpanzees are the only other primate observed hunting in groups, sometimes going on border patrols where they actively seek out neighboring groups of chimpanzees and kill them. Chimpanzees also practice infanticide and cannibalism, both males and females killing and eating chimpanzee offspring that is not their’s. This is a symptom of the chimpanzee’s highly-patriarchal (male-dominated) society, where male domestic violence toward females is commonplace as a means of bullying them into submission.


Credit: collisionality

Bonobos, have a much more peaceful society. They are mostly frugivorous, supplementing their diets with occasional invertebrates, like termites, or small mammals like flying squirrels. Physically, bonobos are “more elegant, longer-legged, and smaller-headed than chimpanzees.” Their body proportions resemble that of Australopithecus, a close ancestor to humans long extinct. This means that Bonobos also more closely resemble us physically, walking upright 25% of the time, exhibiting broader shoulders than chimpanzees and the females having more pronounced breasts.

In contrast to chimpanzees, bonobos have a matriarchal (female-dominated) society, where females are given the highest respect, and which is highly sexualized. While chimpanzees resolve conflicts through violence, bonobos resolve them through sex, both heterosexual and homosexual. When bonobos discover a wealth of food, they immediately diffuse any tension over who gets how much with an orgy. It’s no wonder bonobos are often called the “Make-love-not-war chimp.”

Because bonobos split off from chimpanzees millions of years after humans split off from our common ancestor with pans troglodyte, it would be inaccurate to say we got our behaviors from bonobos, and it would also be inaccurate to say we got our behaviors from chimps, as we have no idea what chimpanzee culture was like five million years ago, and culture, as we see in human history and the divergent histories of bonobos and chimpanzees, evolves very rapidly.

What we can ask from this exercise in comparing our evolutionary cousins is which cultural strategy works best? Both chimpanzees and bonobos are successful cultures, except in the face of human exploitation, and we can all refer to examples of domestic violence, murder, war, peace, free-love, and cooperation in human society. Each strategy works within certain social environments, so perhaps the real question is, which society would you rather live in?

Further Reading:



  1. […] human nature? I've been thinking about this for a while, and this article sums it up nicely: Are Homo Sapiens More Like Bonobos or Common Chimpanzees? Not necessarily in it's conclusion, but it's exposition. What do you think? __________________ […]

    Pingback by What do bonobos and common chimps say about human nature? — January 11, 2011 @ 8:06 pm

  2. […] Zie ook: Apenhersenen herkennen hetzelfde (Kennislinkartikel over onderzoek Parr en co)Op zoek naar het verschil (Kennislinkartikel)Een innig afscheid (Kennislinkartikel)Stamboom van de mens (Kennislinkartikel)Schudden aan de menselijke stamboom (Kennislinkartikel)Bonobo society: amicable, amorous and run by females (artikel uit de New York Times door Natalie Angier) (Engels)The empathic ape (artikel uit de New Scientist door Frans de Waal) (Engels, pdf)Bonobo sex and society (artikel uit de Scientific American door Frans de Waal) (Engels)Meet my cousin, the chimpanzee (artikel uit de New Scientist door Richard Dawkins) (Engels)Are homo sapiens more like bonobo‚Äôs or common chimpanzees? (Engels) […]

    Pingback by Vergelijking mens dier (I ) « Tsjok's blog — September 24, 2012 @ 5:45 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.