Charles Darwin on the Shoulders of Giants

Posted on 12th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Ionian Enchantment

There is grandeur in this view of life… from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved. – Charles Darwin

I firmly reject the idea of The Great Man theory that history is punctuated by the occurrence of elite heroes, and I don’t think Darwin would want us to remember him in a vacuum. Like any good scientist, Darwin built upon the ideas available to him at the time. It was by standing on the shoulders of giants he was able to formulate this most important of theories. Here are just a few names out of the countless individuals who contributed to the theory of evolution:


Portrait of Mary Anning

Portrait of Mary Anning,
British Museum

The “Princess of Paleontology” Mary Anning’s lifetime of work (1799-1847) uncovering fossils of the ichthyosaur, plesiosaur, pterosaur and others provided the evidence that species did go extinct, disappearing from the Earth forever; although, many scientists of the time had difficulty grasping the possibility. The idea that species could vanish from the Earth forever evoked cognitive dissonance when paired up with the idea of a creator.

Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus’ 1795 work Zoönomia was one of many texts from the time that celebrated species’ unique adaptations to their environments, while still sharing many traits:


Erasmus Darwin in 1792

Erasmus Darwin in 1792
Credit: Joseph Wright of Derby

When we revolve in our minds the metamorphoses of animals, as from the tadpole to the frog; secondly, the changes produced by artificial cultivation, as in the breeds of horses, dogs and sheep; thirdly, the changes produced by conditions of climate and season, as in the sheep of warm climates being covered with hair instead of wool, and the hares and partridges of northern climates becoming white in winter; when, further, we observe the changes of structure produced by habit, as shewn especially by men of different occupations; or the changes produced by artificial mutilation and prenatal influences, as in the crossing of species and production of monsters: fourth, when we observe the essential unity of plan in all warmblooded animals, we are led to conclude that they have been alike produced from a single living filament.

Lamarckian Evolution understood adaptation and evolution. The laws it proposed were not new ones, but Lamarck is often credited with its principles that:


Jean-baptiste Lamarck

Jean-baptiste Lamarck
Credit: J. Pizzetta, Ed. Hennuyer, 1893
  1. In every animal which has not passed the limit of its development, a more frequent and continuous use of any organ gradually strengthens, develops and enlarges that organ, and gives it a power proportional to the length of time it has been so used; while the permanent disuse of any organ imperceptibly weakens and deteriorates it, and progressively diminishes its functional capacity, until it finally disappears.
  2. All the acquisitions or losses wrought by nature on individuals, through the influence of the environment in which their race has long been placed, and hence through the influence of the predominant use or permanent disuse of any organ; all these are preserved by reproduction to the new individuals which arise, provided that the acquired modifications are common to both sexes, or at least to the individuals which produce the young.

Thomas Robert Malthus

Thomas Robert Malthus

In his autobiography Darwin talks about how he was taken by Thomas Robert Malthus’ 1798 observation that plants and animals produce far more offspring than can survive. This phenomenon was also true in the human animal, which Malthus attributed to a divine purpose, preventing us from being lazy:

The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race… sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands… gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world.

Darwin didn’t discover the similarities in structures among species. The same number of bones in a human hand was in a whale’s fin as any naturalist could see. Darwin didn’t discover evolution. Any scientist of his worth from Darwin’s time and slightly before it, understood the concepts of inheritance and adaptability of species on a great enough scale to see the big picture: species change over time and adapt remarkably to their environments. Darwin didn’t figure out that species compete for limited resources. Economists knew this fact very well already for the human animal as well as those in the wild. Darwin even presented his idea alongside Alfred Russel Wallace, who independently arrived at nearly the same conclusion.

What Darwin did was put it all together into a natural law. Natural Selection, no invisible creator’s hand to shape it, no species guiding their own adaptations, and no divine plan selecting the chosen from the rest. Natural Selection is simply an algorithm that explains how life, powered by the sun, grows more complex, specialized, and diverse over time.

If Darwin hadn’t discovered it, someone else would have. This simple algorithm was the truth everyone of the time was approaching. It not only built upon all the wisdom that had come before it, but predicted the discoveries that would follow, the chains of fossils, outlining the gradual changes in the species, and the existence of a mechanism by which traits would be passed along, which Gregor Mendel would later figure out with genetics.

So here’s to Charels Darwin, a man with the courage to publish ideas he knew were controversial, because the truth is truth whether you accept it or not. Here’s to all the naturalists who laid the groundwork for Darwin’s idea, and here’s to all the scientists who have expanded and refined the theory. People like Daniel Dennet, Richard Dawkins, Stephen J. Gould, Genetic Algorithm Programmers, Biologists, doctors dealing with bacterial resistance, and others are all standing on the shoulders of the giant, Charles Darwin.

And what does Charles Darwin stand on? As we can see, it’s giants all the way down.

Happy 200th Birthday Charles Darwin and happy Darwin Day.

The Power of JavaScript

Posted on 10th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Geeking Out - Tags:

I’ve been out of the loop when it comes to all the web development advances that have occurred in the last five years, and am now just getting up to speed on them for a project to modernize our Asset Logistics Systems at work. The area most changed since I went into my ASP cave is JavaScript. What with all the HTML DOM manipulation methods, object oriented programming support, asynchronous calls and whatnot, it’s become a whole new playground.

Yesterday I found this incredible example of what JavaScript can do. It’s written entirely in JavaScript, no graphics, no flash, just script (I apologize for the fact that playing this will cause your browser to scroll):


CLICK HERE TO SEE IT
(Sorry, had to take it down b/c the onfocus was messing up the blog mainpage.)

There’s a larger version with music you can play. For more JavaScript game experiments, click here.

Science Stimulus

Posted on 9th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Enlightenment Warrior

Science Debate

Science Debate

Allow me to be upfront in my support for much of the Government Spending portion of the 2009 stimulus plan working its way through the fed presently. $125 billion in education spending, a $3 billion increase in NSF funding, $100 billion for energy infrastructure, and $10 billion for basic science research are just what America needs to get professionals back into the work force right away and make our economy innovative and competitive again for the future; however, I am bothered by the way the bill has been watered down with excessive tax-cuts, which, as the last eight years have shown, do not promote spending.

Paul Krugman, Nobel-Prize-winning and PhD-from-MIT-holding economist says we need to increase spending in the bill and scale back the worthless tax cuts (See also here, here, and here). There’s also Ph.D from University of Pennsylvania economist Mark Zandi, cofounder of Moody’s Economy.com and former economic advisor to Republican presidential candidate John McCain. His research group has been churning out reports like this one that stress the importance of Government Spending over Tax Cuts as the best means to stimulate the economy (see also here):

Fiscal Economic Bang for the Buck
One year $ change in real GDP for a given $ reduction in federal tax revenue or increase in spending:

Tax Cuts
Non-refundable lump-sum tax rebate 1.02
Refundable lump-sum tax rebate 1.26
Temporary tax cuts
payroll tax holiday 1.29
Across the board tax cut 1.03
Accelerated depreciation 0.27
Permanent tax cuts
Extend alternative minimum tax patch 0.48
Make Bush income tax cuts permanent 0.29
Make dividend and capital gains tax cuts permanent 0.37
Cut in corporate tax rate 0.30
Spending Increases
Extending UI Benefits 1.64
Temporary increase in food stamps 1.73
General aid to state governments 1.36
Increase infrastructure spending 1.59
Source: Moody’s Economy.com

Government demand for infrastructure, general scientific research, and public education will immediately put people back to work, invigorate innovation, and improve the marketability of American citizens to the workforce.

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious kudos to Science Debate 2008, which has demonstrated its power as an emerging scientific lobby with their fantastic up-to-the-minute detailed coverage of this dimension to the stimulus debate. They also have a breakdown of the science funding cuts made in the last minute to the bill to persuade Republicans to support it. Dittoheads are demanding much more drastic cuts, but when college dropouts like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity want to cut education and science spending, it’s because they know an educated public doesn’t listen to them.


Note: This doesn’t change my position of economists having no science. There is legitimate dissent to Krugman and Zandi, that relies on historical interpretation and anecdotal evidence… but all macroeconomics seems devoid of experimental evidence. So I’m mainly just celebrating the science and education.

NEMO Science Center: You, Me, Electricity

Posted on 8th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Adventuring

Elektra the Robot

Elektra the Robot

“The medium, or process, of our time – electric technology is reshaping and restructuring patterns of social interdependence and every aspect of our personal life. It is forcing us to reconsider and re-evaluate practically every thought, every action, and every institution formerly taken for granted. Everything is changing: you, your family, your education, your neighborhood, your job, your government, your relation to “the others. And they’re changing dramatically.”

The Medium is The Massage, Marshall McLuhan

See the complete flickr set here.

Comments Off on NEMO Science Center: You, Me, Electricity

JavaScript Turing Machine

Posted on 5th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Geeking Out - Tags:

So I was watching the anime series Ghost in the Shell and I don’t feel productive when I’m just watching anime, and I can’t write words when watching videos, so I decided to do some programming purely for fun.

What I did was write a little demonstration of a Turing Machine. Before there were computers, Alan Turing proved on paper that a machine could perform complex tasks. With a strip of paper divided up into places, the machine may read or write a symbol to its current place, move to another place, or change its state. This way it moves up and down the tape, reading and writing symbols, and, depending on its algorithm (instructions), performs calculations.


A Turing Machine

A Turing Machine

The table below is a JavaScript representation of one such machine. Using five tuples worth of instructions, the machine adjusts the ones and zeros to count upwards in binary. With eight positions on the tape, the machine can count up to 255. You may Start the demonstration, or Step through it. The + and symbols speed up or slow down the execution of steps.

The HTML page is located here. If you’d like to download the code, right click on the link, and select “Save link as…” and then edit the code in notepad to play with it. This code could certainly be written more elegantly, but Ghost in the Shell was pretty engaging, and the more basic code more appropriately speaks to the basic mechanics of what this demonstration is supposed to demonstrate.

If you don’t feel like rewriting JavaScript code, you can check out a programmable Java Turing Machine here, with instructions on its very simple programming language here.

Science and Democracy Empower Each Other

Posted on 4th February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Enlightenment Warrior

Dennis Overbye has a superb commentary in the NYT Elevating Science, Elevating Democracy that reminds me of the Mark Twain quote, “the domain of Science is a republic, and all its citizens are brothers and equals.”

Overbye writes:

[Science], which has transformed the world in the last few centuries, does indeed teach values. Those values, among others, are honesty, doubt, respect for evidence, openness, accountability and tolerance and indeed hunger for opposing points of view. These are the unabashedly pragmatic working principles that guide the buzzing, testing, poking, probing, argumentative, gossiping, gadgety, joking, dreaming and tendentious cloud of activity — the writer and biologist Lewis Thomas once likened it to an anthill — that is slowly and thoroughly penetrating every nook and cranny of the world.

Nobody appeared in a cloud of smoke and taught scientists these virtues. This behavior simply evolved because it worked.

He goes further into this fact of scientific progress marching hand in hand with democratic empowerment. He also talks about science and democracy and how they relate to America’s strongest ideological opponent in the modern world, China, and how empowering scientists is antithetical to totalitarian power. It’s a very inspiring read.

Comments Off on Science and Democracy Empower Each Other

Bayesian Probability Beat Somma’s Stochaistic

Posted on 3rd February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Ionian Enchantment

Here I thought I was so cool coming up with “Somma’s Stochaistic,” the idea that science is inversely proportional to BS:


Science is Inversely Proportional to BS

Somma’s Stochaistic

Now I find out somebody else all ready came up with it and expressed it my more elegantly in something called: Bayesian Probability. The equation for this concept looks like this:


Bayesian Probability

Bayesian Probability

Where:

  • H is a hypothesis
  • D is the data
  • P(H) is the probability that H is correct before the data D was seen.
  • P(D | H) is the conditional probability of seeing the data given that the hypothesis is true.
  • P(D) is the marginal probability of D.
  • P(H | D) is the probability that the hypothesis is true, given the data and the previous state of belief about the hypothesis.

Interestingly enough, the above equation simplifies to this:


Bayesian Probability Simplified

Bayesian Probability Simplified

Stated simply: The probability of being wrong is inversely proportional to the amount of data available.

Paraphrased simply: Science is inversely proportional to BS.

Comments Off on Bayesian Probability Beat Somma’s Stochaistic

Punxsutawney Phil Disproves Anthropogenic Climate Change

Posted on 2nd February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Enlightenment Warrior

THAT’S RIGHT!!! SIX MORE WEEKS OF WINTER!!! Where’s your Anthropogenic Climate Change now scientists??? Huh? HUH?? HUH???


Punxsutawney Phil

Punxsutawney Phil says HUH!?!?
Credit: alemaxale

An you know what else??? It snowed somewhere in America last week. That’s right. IT SNOWED IN JANUARY SOMEWHERE IN AMERICA!!! In fact, as of my writing this, people are still without power!!! (Pay no attention to the crumbling American infrastructure those bleeding-heart libbies keep throwing up as a red heron.)

You know what else? It snowed in Washington DC right at the same time Al Gore was giving a talk on Climate Change!!! That totally disproves him you know??? It does so!!! It’s a logical phallusy to omit the snowing outside where he was giving his talk!

So take that you libruls!!! You might have 40 or more scientific organizations drinking your AGW Kool-Aid, but we have the American Association of Petroleum Geologists denying it! So it’s not a consensus!!! Plus we have the snow and winter and a world-famous Ground Hog and exclamation points and ALL CAPS!!! <– LOOK AT THOSE EXCLAMATION POINTS AND ALL CAPS EQUALS NO CONSENSUS!!! NOOOOOO!!! CONSENSUS!!!

Plus we have Rush Limbaugh, who’s doubly famous because he totally looks like that guy who stole Pee Wee Herman’s bike!!!


Rush Limbaugh totally looks like that Guy Who Stole Pee Wee Herman's Bike

Rush Limbaugh totally looks like
that Guy Who Stole Pee Wee Herman’s Bike

Credit: Moi

A guy who looks like the guy who stole Pee Wee’s bike is NO CONSENSUS!!! Thpppt!!! ON YOU!!! THPPPT!!!! THPPPT!!! THPPPT!!!

(Sorry. This is what happens when I read the Drudge Report.)

NEMO Science Center: Studio Bits & Co

Posted on 1st February 2009 by Ryan Somma in Adventuring

Aesthedes Work Station for Graphic Design (1982)

Aesthedes Work Station for Graphic Design (1982)

This very small room, hidden in the back of NEMO, virtually ignored, was a little something for Information Science. It runs from the 1940s to the 1980s, bits of history people are going to cherish in the future. The more I get into Computers as my science, the more I enjoy displays like this.

See the complete flickr set here.