<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil is Misses One Very Important Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClintJCL</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-7735</link>
		<dc:creator>ClintJCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-7735</guid>
		<description>I find Viewzi slow and cumbersome. Can&#039;t even open results in a new window (I don&#039;t wait for page loads.. Homey don&#039;t play that game.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Viewzi slow and cumbersome. Can&#8217;t even open results in a new window (I don&#8217;t wait for page loads.. Homey don&#8217;t play that game.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doranchak</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>doranchak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>Cuil has been getting universally panned it seems.  Must suck for them, considering how much they paid for PR during their high-profile launch.

I much prefer Viewzi:

http://www.viewzi.com

The results are useful AND very uniquely presented.  All the different &quot;views&quot; are fun to play with.  I like the 3D Photo Cloud View.  And I like how the Video X3 View shows short animated thumbnails of some of the videos in the search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil has been getting universally panned it seems.  Must suck for them, considering how much they paid for PR during their high-profile launch.</p>
<p>I much prefer Viewzi:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.viewzi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.viewzi.com</a></p>
<p>The results are useful AND very uniquely presented.  All the different &#8220;views&#8221; are fun to play with.  I like the 3D Photo Cloud View.  And I like how the Video X3 View shows short animated thumbnails of some of the videos in the search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sour Swinger</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-7657</link>
		<dc:creator>Sour Swinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-7657</guid>
		<description>Cuil definitely disappointed me.  The only thing I liked about it was the web 2.0 feeling.  They certainly do have a LONG way to go if they want dethrone even other  non-google search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil definitely disappointed me.  The only thing I liked about it was the web 2.0 feeling.  They certainly do have a LONG way to go if they want dethrone even other  non-google search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlonia - Cuil Results</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-7266</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlonia - Cuil Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-7266</guid>
		<description>Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two - many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#039;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine. 

In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Cuil was not quite ready for launch during the first day or two &#8211; many medium long tail queries did not return results at all, and even general queries returned way fewer results than they should have considering Cuil&#8217;s claims of having indexed so many pages already. They did improve somewhat afterward, however, and seem to be picking up more results and increasing relevance as more people have been testing out the engine. </p>
<p>In the long run, I hope they get things together and perform well enough to compete with the major search engines and then maybe do some advertising. I would like to see more serious competitors to Google in order to hold their power in check and encourage more transparency overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMF</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6955</link>
		<dc:creator>BMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-6955</guid>
		<description>For supposedly indexing so many pages, you would think they would be able to point here? This is the third non-indexed site I&#039;ve come across in the Cuil search engine.

-BMF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For supposedly indexing so many pages, you would think they would be able to point here? This is the third non-indexed site I&#8217;ve come across in the Cuil search engine.</p>
<p>-BMF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6930</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-6930</guid>
		<description>I like the way google uses search patterns to tailor results.. IDK how that&#039;s a negative =\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way google uses search patterns to tailor results.. IDK how that&#8217;s a negative =\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClintJCL</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6905</link>
		<dc:creator>ClintJCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-6905</guid>
		<description>Color me unimpressed:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=clintjcl&amp;btnG=Google+Search 
vs 
http://www.cuil.com/search?q=clintjcl&amp;sl=lon

Gee, which one brings up my RELEVANT profiles, versus things I did once and never did again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color me unimpressed:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=clintjcl&#038;btnG=Google+Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=clintjcl&#038;btnG=Google+Search</a><br />
vs<br />
<a href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=clintjcl&#038;sl=lon" rel="nofollow">http://www.cuil.com/search?q=clintjcl&#038;sl=lon</a></p>
<p>Gee, which one brings up my RELEVANT profiles, versus things I did once and never did again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://ideonexus.com/2008/07/30/cuil-is-misses-one-very-important-website/comment-page-1/#comment-6904</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideonexus.com/?p=1635#comment-6904</guid>
		<description>They should have gone with http://www.Coil.com/ instead of Cuil.com

Coil.com is:
- Easy to pronounce
- Easy to spell
- Catchy
- Short
- Memorable

It would have also been a good idea for them to launch a private Alpha and Beta before launching their search engine to the public.  10 years ago this launch would have been fine but people&#039;s expectations are much higher now after having used Google Search for many years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have gone with <a href="http://www.Coil.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.Coil.com/</a> instead of Cuil.com</p>
<p>Coil.com is:<br />
- Easy to pronounce<br />
- Easy to spell<br />
- Catchy<br />
- Short<br />
- Memorable</p>
<p>It would have also been a good idea for them to launch a private Alpha and Beta before launching their search engine to the public.  10 years ago this launch would have been fine but people&#8217;s expectations are much higher now after having used Google Search for many years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

